Loading…
Loading…
In workforce analytics, proof of work connects tracked time to evidence such as app and URL context, active and idle patterns, screenshots where appropriate, and session timelines. The goal is not to watch employees minute by minute. It is to make payroll, client billing, and performance conversations easier to verify after the fact.
A client questions 12 hours on an invoice from six weeks ago. The record shows the sessions, which applications were open, and the project they were labelled against. The conversation takes ten minutes instead of becoming a negotiation about trust. That is the entire value: not watching the work happen, but being able to answer a question about it afterwards.
Building the record for accusation rather than for answers. Teams that frame proof of work as catching people produce defensive employees and unusable data. Teams that frame it as being able to answer client and payroll questions get the same record and none of the damage.
No, though it can become that. The distinguishing properties are whether the people covered can see their own record, whether the purpose is stated, and whether the evidence is reviewed when a question arises rather than continuously. Evidence gathered for a stated purpose and visible to its subject is a record; the same data gathered secretly and watched live is not.
Enough to answer the question you actually face. For client billing that usually means session times plus project and application context. For payroll it may be less. Collecting more than the question needs adds privacy risk without adding usefulness.
Kyrospect is the first platform built explicitly around these principles for remote teams.
Explore Kyrospect